Lyndon Johnson was once on the verge of becoming one of America's greatest presidents.

But with a single wrong turn into Vietnam, LBJ plunged himself and the nation into a ghastly tragedy that still makes us all weep and bleed.

It is NOW! up to us to make sure Barack Obama does not do the same.

Even the corporate media shows signs of understanding the parallels between Vietnam and Afghanistan. So many of us are alive today who remember March, 1965, and all the horror that followed, that there is simply no excuse for allowing this lethal mistake to be repeated.

LBJ inherited the momentum of the New Frontier, the murder of John Kennedy and a huge 1964 electoral mandate. He turned them into a string of civil rights and social welfare victories that still vastly enhance all our lives.

But LBJ also inherited from JFK the beginnings of the war in Vietnam. LBJ's choice was to escalate or pull out. Recent biographies indicate he had a strong premonition that the war was futile, and that it would do him in. A century from now, historians will still agonize over why he took the plunge anyway.

On Friday, the permitted march began in a section of greater Pittsburgh called Oakland. This initial march was modest in size and intensity, but as it made its way from Oakland to downtown, a number of other marches combined with it, resulting in a demonstration whose size and intensity was perhaps what activists, reporters, and spectators were hoping for. The route from Oakland to downtown involved passing through an area called SoHo where there were many run-down buildings. Nearby, the new stadium for the Pittsburgh Penguins is being built.

The BNY Mellon arena may lead to the neighborhood being gentrified, said Lois Mufuka Martin who helps to run a homeless shelter in this neighborhood. "They will want to make this area more inviting for people to come here, but what's going to happen to the people living here? I'm not against the transition if we're not displaced," Martin said, in front of the Bethelehem Haven homeless shelter. The building appears to have housed a bank long ago. A bronze plate near the door of the homeless shelter read "Merchant Banking and Trust Company."

Many of them wore kerchiefs over their faces, along with goggles during the protests today. It seems that anarchism has things in common with neo-conservatism with its emphasis on a lack of government control so as to enable huge corporations to escape accountability to the general public.

The vast majority of the police at the G-20 are working-class or middle-class people. They obviously are not economic elites deciding on the policies of the G-20.

This reminds me of how some protesters against the US war in Vietnam villified the veterans of that war as "baby killers" and police officers as "pigs". One person by the name of David Aschkenas was along the route of the start of the protest in a section of Pittsburgh called Oakland, taking photos where the route of the march included a sweeping view of the South Side of Pittsburgh where houses and buildings appeared as beige and grey spots in the green hills.

He said "there are good cops and bad cops just like there are good anarchists and bad anarchists." Before going to Pittsburgh, I was concerned that mainstream media outlets would focus on the violence, drama, and whatever they thought were freak-show aspects of the protests, if they reported on it at all.

Today, as was the case during yesterday's protests, there was a large group protesting against China's policies toward Tibet. There were some people near me who were taunting the black-clad riot police by humming one of the themes from a Star Wars movie.

There were signs and chants saying "money for jobs and education not wars and occupation." There was a marching band playing The Battle Hymn of the Republic and an anarchist group chanting "no laws, no borders, no bosses," and a sign that read "Obama, keep your fair trade promises, and "rescue Falun Gong practitioners "

Later I met Adan Stevens-Diaz who came to Pittsburgh from Brooklyn, NY. He was carrying a sign that read " Obama, you're a speech walking. So was Robespeare." When we spoke, Diaz referred to Obama as a "walking sound byte."

The smaller march in Oakland made its way down the slope of 5th Avenue into downtown. When I got there, it was too crowded for me to get close to the area where people were giving electrically amplified speeches. But I caught some of what they were saying. I had heard some of it during events earlier in the week, before this main rally took place.
are pretty much just as bad as the G-20 protestors. Of course not everyone thinks this.
It seems ironic that some public misconceptions about G-20 protesters have involved the idea that activists are storing human waste to be used against the police and other people. My guess is that the vast majority of the people involved with protesting the G-20 are also intensely and extensively involved in serving their communities, whether it's helping to feed, house, or educate people or some other type of sevice.

Today two young men repeated to me the tale of urine -filled barrels being discovered in Seattle in 2000. He also said people staying at a small tent city in the Hill District had something similar going on during the past few days.

His view of the people at the tent city contrasts with that of the people at the People's Summit who talked about the problems of foreclosures and how domestic and international policies are hurting people. It seems that an element of public sentiment about the G-20 is the idea that people who question and oppose our leaders are pretty much lowlife terrorists and the people who are hurting econi
As the People's Tribunal comes to an end, I have the urge to raise my hand to ask why there has been no arguments made in defense of the G-20, but I won't because doing so won't achieve anything.
za of United Students Against Sweatshops, said that Obama is wrong by saying that G-20 protestors have too abstract ideas in terms of their opposition to G-20.
Alberto Arroyo of Red Mexicana de Accion Frente al Libre Comercio is speaking . He said G-20 wants his people to produce crops used to fuel their nations' car instead of using them for food. They have taken away our right to be able to live on our own country and then say we are illegal when we are forced to emmigrate. G-20 has developed free trade agreements that obligate poor countries' governments to place interests of corporations over those of its people. The legislation in many of our countries is being changed so we don't have the right to protest all of this. They govs. that promote corporate interests over those of its people--ie assassination attempt on Evo Morales and also something similar in Venuzuella and in Honduras.

Pages

Subscribe to ColumbusFreePress.com  RSS