Advertisement

Thanks again for fighting for Ohio and helping to keep the issue alive.  I notice that you have had the habit of joining and fighting for all of the great causes of recent times.  And, while it's hard to win everything due to the structure of society, in each instance you've won large victories.  I believe you will see that your efforts over the election fraud issue will pay off eventually.

At any rate, the only faith I have in improvement is from the hope of seeing courageous individuals like yourself take on the system and winning.
The lawsuit challenging Ohio's 2004 presidential race has been withdrawn from the Ohio Supreme Court, having served as a lightning rod to draw national attention to the widespread and possibly illegal irregularities in the vote that gave George W. Bush a term as president starting in January.

While the election challenge lawyers say they may raise the suit's constitutional and civil rights issues in other legal venues, the case, Moss. V. Bush, became a vehicle for an aggressive investigation of irregularities in the Ohio presidential vote that culminated in a congressional challenge of the 2004 Electoral College.

AUSTIN, Texas -- Cheez, I go to all this trouble not to call the president of the United States a liar -- perhaps misinformed, did not seem to know about, no one has told him, etc. -- and then he just comes flat out with a whopper.

Drolly enough, he prefaced his latest with the unlikely statement, "As a matter of fact ..." before he proceeded to do battle against truth: "... by the time today's workers who are in their mid-20s begin to retire, the system will be bankrupt. So if you're 20 years old, in your mid-20s, and you're beginning to work, I want you to think about a Social Security system that will be flat bust, bankrupt, unless the United States Congress has got the willingness to act now. And that's what we're here to talk about, a system that will be bankrupt."

George W. Bush gasped at the effrontery: how dare U.N. Emergency Relief Coordinator Jan Egelund charge that the developed nations of the world have been “stingy” when it comes to tsunami relief! The President fired back petulantly that the United States is a “generous, kindhearted nation”. And so it is, judging from the many charitable donations made by American individuals and corporations since Egelund’s comment. But bear in mind three other truths.

     1. The initial offer of aid by the United States government was only $15 million, a gratuitously insulting amount considering what is being spent to murder innocents in the President’s war on Iraq, and to celebrate that slaughter at the second Bush inaugural. The Bush Administration pours hundreds of billions into a preemptive war against a country that had nothing to do with 9/11.

     2. The eventual offer of $350 million was made very grudgingly after several highly critical stories by the media.

     3. If you would know the values of a nation or of an individual human being, “follow the money”; those truly generous and kind-hearted spend more to heal than to kill.
Much has been heard about Social Security being “in crisis.” It isn’t. Very long term, there’s a potential problem if current longevity trends continue. We are living a lot longer, and sometime around 2040 there might be more people collecting than paying in. We shouldn’t ignore it altogether. But the so-called crisis isn’t why George W. Bush wants to gradually substitute private investment accounts for part of the trust fund. Like everything else in the Karl Rove White House, it’s a smokescreen.

Bush isn’t the sharpest tack on the bulletin board, needless to say, but his Wall Street friends have surely reminded him of what is bound to happen if a flood of new money pours into mutual funds and stocks all at once. That’s right…a bull market that will make the 1990s look tame. A new generation of Gordon Gekkos will proclaim that greed is good, indeed.

And that’s the whole point. Republicans have never forgiven Bill Clinton for anything. It’s not just about Monica Lewinsky. How unjust for Bush that a bull market in stocks ended just as Clinton left office! How unfair that the budget surplus under
Dear Dr. J. Alva Scruggs!
I'm just a visitor of your web-site.My name is Anastasiya,I'm from Ukraine.

Let me put in sharper focus your article "US tells Ukraine to recount votes on fradulent election!"(dated November 25, 2004)

To my mind you made a mistake by using the name of Mr.Yanukovich-instead of Mr.Yushenko.(a cadidate from opposition)

It was Mr Yushenko who was supported by the USA and it was he(Yushenko)who"has chosen continue to stand with his supporters and fight for an honest look at the Fraud"

Please check this facts! Thanks for your consideration!
From the beginning of the 2004 election the constituency of Democrat voters could be described as scared optimists. We willingly gave our money, time and effort and fought hard for a cause we ultimately lost. As we watched the campaign take its course, the hypocrisy of the Bush-Rove political machine alternately left us either slack-jawed or confounded with its hypocrisy, its deceit, and its determination to rewrite our freedom! This, of course began way before 9/11! Between the corporately funded propaganda collaborating with the media’s ludicrous political judgments, we felt as Sherlock Holmes, when he said, “I wonder how a battery feels when it pours electricity into a non-conductor!”

Network's Craven Back-Down on Bush Draft Dodge Report Sure to Get a Standing Rove-ation at White House

"Independent" my ass. CBS' cowardly purge of five journalists who exposed George Bush's dodging of the Vietnam War draft was done under cover of what the network laughably called an "Independent Review Panel."

The "panel" was just two guys as qualified for the job as they are for landing the space shuttle: Dick Thornburgh and Louis Boccardi.

Remember Dickie Thornburgh? He was on the Bush 41 Administration's payroll. His grand accomplishment as Bush's Attorney General was to whitewash the investigation of the Exxon Valdez Oil spill, letting the oil giant off the hook on big damages. Thornburgh's fat pay as counsel to Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, the Washington law-and-lobbying outfit, is substantially due to his job as a Bush retainer. This is the kind of stinky conflict of interest that hardly suggests "independent." Why not just appoint Karl Rove as CBS' grand inquisitor and be done with it?

The new year promises a rich manure of hypocrisy and bad faith. Take the current tumult here in the United States about the U.N. high command and the oil-for-food imbroglio, which right-wing columnists are gnawing on with relish. There are no good guys here, just vistas of corruption and bad faith stretching into the distance.

Certainly, weep not for Kofi Annan, whose servility toward the imperatives of Empire was comically revealed in the very same press conference where a pertinacious journalist extorted from the reluctant secretary general the grudging admission that the war on Iraq was illegal. Later on, Annan offhandedly invoked "our allies," a term that should be alien to the lips of any U.N. secretary general but that accurately reflects political realities.

The private dealings of the Annan family may well be fragrant with corruption, but it's hard to get too excited about alleged skims off the oil-for-food deals against so vivid a backdrop as hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians, many of them infants, being starved to death or dying for lack of suitable medicines under the U.N. sanctions commanded by the United States.

AUSTIN, Texas --- Excuse me, but is that smoke in your ear?

I wouldn't go calling anyone a liar, but as we say in our quaint Texas fashion, this administration is stuffed with people who are on a first-name basis with the bottom of the deck. They've been telling us only four out of the 18 provinces in Iraq will be too unsafe to vote in. Doesn't sound that bad, does it? Unless you happen to know that about 50 percent of the population lives in those four provinces.

Will someone explain to me what earthly good they expect to do by misleading us? If, God forbid, the Iraqi election turns out to be a disaster, will we be better off for not having expected it? How long are Bush and Cheney going to sit there pretending the problem is that the media won't report the "good news" out of Iraq? Be a lot more useful if they paid attention to some of the bad news.

Pages

Subscribe to ColumbusFreePress.com  RSS