Whether one views the 9/11 "terrorist" attacks as blow
back, a wake-up call, or an unjustified outrage, they
have deeply affected the American psyche and our
attitudes toward war, the future, and the world. As a
historian trying to understand this phenomenon, I tend
to view the government's behavior, before and after
9/11, in the context of its leaders' past actions.
Before 9/11, Bush's inner circle of neoconservative
advisors proclaimed the need for a dramatic expansion
of U.S. military might entailing "full spectrum
dominance" over all other nations and regions
(including outer space), long term petro-resource
control with permanent Middle East bases, and a
preemptive First Strike policy against recalcitrant
states. In September 2000, however, the neocon's
flagship think tank, the Project for a New America
Century, warned that this "process of transformation,
even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be
a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing
event - like a new Pearl Harbor."
After 9/11, this administration systematically nurtured
the fear of further homeland attacks to justify its own