Advertisement

Lee Gough won’t be paying her federal income taxes this year.

That doesn’t mean, however, that the artist and part-time temp worker won’t be setting money aside for April 15th – just that the federal government won’t be getting any of it. The 37-year old Brooklynite has decided to make 2004 the year that she takes a stand, a move she’s been working towards for some time now. “I’ve asked the temp agency to increase the number of allowances on my W-4 form, and when I had unemployment I told them not to take any taxes out,” she says. “I’ve also stopped paying the federal excise tax on my phone bill, and when tax time comes along, I’ll take the $13 I’ve collected and redirect it to a more worthy cause.”

AUSTIN, Texas -- Iraq. What. A. Mess.

            As Cousin Eddie Faulk used to say during Vietnam, "If those folks don't like what we're doin' for 'em, why don't they just go back where they come from?"

            Eric Alterman sums up the position of the "We told you so" crowd thusly:

            -- The invasion of Iraq will cause, not prevent terrorism.

            -- The Bush administration was not to be trusted when it warned of the WMD threat.

            -- Going in without the United Nations is worse than not going in at all.

            -- They were asleep at the switch pre-9/11 and have been trying to cover this up ever since.

            -- And they manipulated 9-11 as a pretext for a long-planned invasion of Iraq.

            -- Any occupation by a foreign power, particularly one as incompetently planned as this one, will likely create more enemies than friends and put the United States in a situation similar at times to Vietnam, and at other times, similar to Israel's occupation of Lebanon; both were disasters.

Richard Clarke was right. So was Paul O'Neill. During the six months before the 9/11 terrorist attacks the Bush administration paid little attention to the threat from al-Qaeda and instead set the stage for a war with Iraq.  

Two weeks before the 9/11 terrorist attacks, national security wasn't even a top priority for the Bush administration. Security-job security, health security and national security-was last on a list of major issues Bush planned to deal with in the fall of 2001, according to a transcript http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/08/20010831-3.html of a speech Bush gave on Aug. 31, 2001 to celebrate the launch of the White House's new website.

  National Security Adviser Condoleeza Rice, who is scheduled to testify Thursday before the commission investigating the 9/11 terrorist attacks, says Clarke, President Bush's counterterrorism specialist, is a liar after Clarke told the commission two weeks ago that the Bush administration failed to deal with al-Qaeda seriously before 9/11.  

Bush, Cheney, Ashcroft, Ridge, Rumsfeld, Scalia, Rove

PRESIDENT BUSH: Tony! Tony! Tony! Great to have you here.

You owe it to your fellow Americans to go on the No-CARB Diet in 2004!

No  Cheney
No  Ashcroft
No  Rumsfeld
No  Bush


Some of the most closely guarded documents in the White House are sure to be the ones written by the president’s top media strategist. The public will never get to see the key memos from Karl Rove, but a typical one these days might read something like...

     To: George and Dick

     Re: Media Terrain

     First, don’t worry about Richard Clarke. We’ll fix his wagon.

     About Condi testifying in public -- people forget she can spin with the best. Is history ready for a black female Ollie North with a Ph.D.?

     Closer to home now. I say this with the fondest high regard, etc., but both of you need to remember my admonition about looking a bit cartoonish on occasion. George, keep practicing that smile like I told you -- it still drifts a little too much toward “What, Me Worry?” -- and we sure don’t need that in swing states. Repeat after me: “I am not Alfred E. Neuman...”

     And Dick. Respectfully. The hunched over talking-into-your-wrists thing has just got to go. I don’t know if you and Lynne ever watch “The
Seven more nations are joining the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), and three more Central European nations have their applications pending. Although the Bush administration has set an overall course in foreign and military policy of treaty-breaking and unilateralism, it remains a strong proponent of NATO expansion.

Founded in 1949 as a security buffer against the Soviet Union, NATO has not only survived the end of the cold war. It is flourishing. Despite criticism that a post-cold war NATO would unnecessarily propagate the West-East security divide that shaped international relations for the four decades of the cold war, the U.S. government has led the drive to energize and expand NATO. In 1999, after contentious debate in the U.S. Senate, the U.S. approved the accession of Poland, Czech Republic, and Hungary to NATO. Leading the NATO enlargement lobby was the neoconservative Committee to Expand NATO, which brought together several prominent neocons now serving in the Bush administration, along with conservative Democrats such as Will Marshall of the Progressive Policy Institute and the Democratic Leadership Council.

AUSTIN, Texas -- Strange peaches. All of us out here in the boonies should be aware this is a truly weird political year. For one thing, nobody has ever seen this much money involved. What can $200 million do in a political race, answered, we presume, by at least $100 million by the Democrats? No one knows.

            And now brace yourselves for the really bad news. All this money, intensity and advertising is not going to be spread out across 50 states. There are only 14 to 19 states considered "in play" in this election, not either solidly red or blue, Republican or Democrat. What that means is that all this money is going to hit relatively few citizens like a tidal wave.

            Most of us, in most of the states, will barely be aware there is a presidential election going on -- we're out of this loop, team. Nobody will be talking to us. Because we're not "in play," this election is not about us. For reasons established by supposedly skilful polling, none of us even get to be part of this election. We're taken for granted.

Pages

Subscribe to ColumbusFreePress.com  RSS