AUSTIN, Texas -- I'm not a weapons expert, and you're not a weapons expert,
so how are we supposed to know whether the National Missile Defense system
is a good idea?
Even if you've read enough about it to be skeptical, there are real, actual
experts claiming that it's a dandy notion. Generals at the Pentagon bent
over double with brass want this thing. And many, many of the politicians of
our nation agree that it will be a bonanza of contracts for defense plants
in every congressional district.
So there it stands (well, actually, it doesn't -- it keeps blowing up): a
monument to our nation's peculiar political and weapons procurement systems.
You may recall that the last time they tested it, the booster thing
attached to the kill-thing that's supposed to fly off and hit the incoming
missile failed to come apart from its other thingie, and went gerblob
instead. (See? Anyone can discuss National Missile Defense.) That cost us
$100 million.
And the time before that, it turned out that the Pentagon had cheated to
make the missile-hitting missile look good.