Advertisement

At the conclusion of his 1963 “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., expressed the “hope that the dark clouds of racial prejudice will soon pass away and the deep fog of misunderstanding will be lifted from our fear-drenched communities.”

So let’s join Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition, Logistics and Technol- ogy Edward C. “Pete” Aldridge at a recent Pentagon press briefing, where he’s addressing concerns about the Pentagon’s bold new plan to have Admiral John Poindexter personally review exactly what you bought in Safeway last week and all the dirty movies you ordered up in Motel 6 last time you were on the road.

Poindexter, you’ll recall, is the bespectacled seadog who, as one of Reagan’s National Security chieftains, instrumented another bold effort in synergy, later known as Iran/Contra, which involved shuffling money and guns along the axis of evil from Iran to the Nicaraguan contras in defiance of U.S. laws at the time. Poindexter got nailed for lying to Congress but was later pardoned.

How words are used can be crucial to understanding and misunder standing the world around us. The media lexicon is saturated with certain buzz phrases. They’re popular — but what do they mean? “The use of words is to express ideas,” James Madison wrote. “Perspicuity, therefore, requires not only that the ideas should be distinctly formed, but that they should be expressed by words distinctly and exclusively appropriate to them.” More than two centuries later, surveying the wreckage of public language in political spheres, you might be tempted to murmur: “Dream on, Jim.”

With 2002 nearing its end in the midst of great international tension, here’s a sampling of some top U.S. media jargon:

“Pre-emptive”
This adjective represents a kind of inversion of the Golden Rule: “Do violence onto others just in case they might otherwise do violence onto you.” Brandished by Uncle Sam, we’re led to believe that’s a noble concept.

“Weapons of mass destruction”
The Columbus Free Press is launching its own Office of Total Counter-Information Awareness. In the last few months, we’ve accumulated enough information to warrant the impeachment of President George Bush.

First, let’s recall Bush’s strange relationship with that bizarre little company in Lansing, Michigan, known as Bioport. The company, despite failing various FDA inspections and being accused of bad record-keeping, holds the only federal contract for producing the anthrax vaccine. Bush has rewarded Bioport with favors such as ongoing military protection, and within weeks of 9/11 granted them a contract that tripled the price per vaccine. Now, add into the mix that the Strangelovian CIA-connected Battelle and Britain’s top secret Porton Down labs are partners with Bioport.

Some resent the term “class warfare,” but what a great description for our headlong rush to war with Iraq: Class Warfare. Ask yourself, “Who will benefit and who will pay?” While there is no evidence of a connection between Iraq and Al-Qaida, there ARE many indications that war with Iraq will energize Al-Qaida and other terrorist groups. Why would anyone want that?

Plans were prepared for a war with Iraq BEFORE the attack of September 11. How could those plans result from an act of terrorism which had not yet occurred and which, by its own statement, the administration could not have anticipated?

If America’s goal is to protect Iraq’s neighbors, why are all its neighbors except Israel against the war? If our goal is to protect the larger world from a mad man, why has the rest of the world been so loath to support us?

Although virtually unnoticed in Columbus, Dr. Jonathan I. Groner, the Trauma Medical Director at Children’s Hospital, is spearheading an international debate on the role of U.S. doctors in carrying out prison executions by lethal injection. After being rejected by American medical journals, Groner’s article “Lethal Injection: A stain on the face of medicine” was published in the November 2, 2002 issue of the British Medical Journal. Groner’s article questions the ethics of U.S. doctors who willingly participate in the execution of inmates. The article also points out parallels between the government’s use of doctors to administer lethal injection and a similar procedure that was administered by doctors in a Nazi Germany “euthanasia” program.

Within days of publication, the French newspaper Le Figaro interviewed Groner about the article. “By entering the death chamber, not only do they [U.S. doctors] destroy their relationship with their own patients, but they take the world medical community hostage. Imagine if all the doctors refused, execution would stop in this country, unless a corp of medical executioners was created,” Groner told Le Figaro.
George Orwell wrote 1984 as a warning of the threat of totali- tarianism. But when George W. Bush read the CliffsNotes version he must have seen it as a blueprint for good government.

Bush’s continued chipping away at Americans’ rights as part of the war on terrorism is one prominent example of his penchant for a supreme government. The most frightening manifestation of this is the Pentagon’s plan to use computers to monitor hundreds of thousands of civilians in search of terrorists. What makes this idea even more scary is the person Bush has put in charge of it — John M. Poindexter. The former national security adviser was convicted in 1990 on five felony counts for his role in the Iran-Contra scandal, but the convictions were overturned because he had been given immunity for his testimony during the congressional investigation of the affair.

Another example of Bush’s push for a supreme empire is his threatened war on Iraq. To our Orwellian president, this war is peace — Pax Americana style.

As we go to press, the Bush administration ordered its predictable post-Christmas call-up of U.S. troops. President George W. Bush is busy resurrecting the discredited doctrine of “preventative” war to justify an attack on Iraq. “Preventative” war was last invoked by Nazi party leaders as a defense of their actions during the Nuremberg trials. The U.S. government is engaging in an unprecedented propaganda campaign to justify its invasion and occupation of Iraq. Our government’s plans to seize 119-billion barrels of known Iraqi oil reserves are conveniently ignored. Still, the reality of selling the Iraq war is proving difficult, especially since Iraq has no nuclear weapons, and its only known link to biochemical weapons were those supplied by the U.S. and its allies during the 1980s.

While the U.S. points fingers at Iraq, the press routinely reports that the Bush’s chief Islamic ally in the region, Pakistan, provided the nuclear technology to North Korea. So, Pakistan, a major nuclear power, with direct ties to Al Qaeda and the North Korean nuclear weapons program, is not a threat according to Bush.

Jobs with Justice continues to work as part of the statewide coalition to win the Ohio Prescription Drug Fair Pricing Act. This will be a state bulk buying program, similar to the one passed in Maine, that will allow discounts estimated to be as high as 50% for important prescription drugs for anyone not covered by insurance plans.

On October 30, 2002, a statewide rally and march were held at the State House in Columbus. About 200 people participated, including about 50 from the Cleveland area. Cleveland JwJ organized a bus to take people down to the capitol, and was very visible at the rally and march. Very visible unions included SEIU, AFSCME, UAW, USWA, UNITE, and others. Numerous retiree organizations were active. There were people from a variety of community groups, including UHCAN Ohio, and religious organizations, including the Commission on Catholic Community Action of the Diocese of Cleveland. Two days later, Cleveland JwJ organized people chanting and holding signs about the same issue outside the last gubernatorial candidates’ debate in Cleveland. www.jwj.org
January 22, 2003, will mark the 30th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision, the landmark privacy ruling that gives women the constitutional right to choose abortion. With the Nov. 5 elections giving Republicans the majority of the House and Senate, and with staunchly anti-abortion George W. Bush in the White House, this triumvirate of power makes the struggle to maintain abortion and reproductive rights so much more difficult and imperative.

It is estimated that prior to the passage of Roe v. Wade, tens of thousands of women died as a result of illegal abortions. Since the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, women have lost ground to an anti-choice movement whose aggressive behavior has passed many onerous restrictions to abortion rights and threatened to crush the very rights it took generations to win — both through legislation and through Supreme Court decisions.

Pages

Subscribe to ColumbusFreePress.com  RSS