Character of man with pointing stick pointing at a map of the US on a board and the words above "As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down

The US Supreme Court (by the usual 5-4 vote) has certified Ohio’s Jim Crow stripping of more than a million mostly black and Hispanic citizens from the 2018 voter registration rolls.

In an age of computerized registration books and extensive ID requirements, there's no real reason to strip people’s names from voter rolls. In the European Union, governments are required to register voters.

Unless the Democrats effectively respond, a GOP victory in the 2018 mid-term election may be a done deal.

The decision approves Ohio’s race-based assault on the right to vote. Secretary of State Jon Husted has been stripping citizens who don’t vote in consecutive federal elections. His office mailed some 1.5 million queries to registered voters. He got back fewer than 300,000 responses – and then stripped some 1.2 million voters from the computer files.

Husted (now running for lieutenant governor) says he’s sent voters a notice after they skip a single federal election. If they don’t vote or respond in the next four years, they lose their ballot.

Court documents confirm that those eliminated are mostly urban blacks and Hispanics in mostly Democratic districts. Voters in rural Republican districts are often not queried, and their registration rolls are not stripped.

The usual five GOP Justices have ruled that this is fine with them. Secretaries of state throughout the US can now do the same thing.

The decision overturned a lower court decision. It joins a nationwide GOP campaign to disenfranchise suspected Democrats – mostly of color – by demanding photo ID, eliminating early and Sunday voting, closing neighborhood precincts, stopping same-day registration and more.

GOP officials in Ohio, Alabama and elsewhere have fought easily re-counted paper balloting by letting local election boards turn off the simple function on some machines that produce a ballot image that can be reliably verified.

The GOP is also defending gerrymandered districts that give them control of the US House and many state legislatures. With votes split evenly between the two major parties, Ohio has 12 GOP US representatives versus 4 Democrats. Both houses of the state legislature have overwhelming Republican majorities, as in North Carolina, Wisconsin and elsewhere.

The Democratic response has been weak. Unless the party mounts a massive voter registration drive, checks the rolls before election day, shepherds people to the polls, fights off gerrymandering, watches the electronic voting machines and much more, it stands no chance to shift the balance of power away from the GOP this coming fall.

We’ve seen it all before.

In Florida 2000, Governor Jeb Bush used a ChoicePoint computer program to disenfranchise more than 90,000 alleged felons (virtually none actually were) in an election decided for his brother by 537 votes. Corporate Democrats still blame Ralph Nader for a rigged Al Gore loss on which he had no real impact.

In Ohio 2004, Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell stripped more than 300,000 mostly urban Democrats from voter rolls in an election decided by 118,775. Blackwell chaired the Committee to Re-Elect Bush and Cheney while running the election. Kerry had been thoroughly briefed but never said a public word. Some 90,000 ballots remain uncounted from Ohio 2004. When a federal judge ordered a recount, 56 of Ohio’s 88 election board claimed the ballots had been (illegally) destroyed.

From 2005 to 2008, some 1.25 million Ohio voters were stripped from the registration rolls, about a quarter of the state’s voters. Some 1.1 million more were removed between 2009 and 2012. In 2016, another million-plus were removed, allowing Donald Trump to win the state.

In Wisconsin, Michigan and other closely contended 2016 key swing states, thousands of mostly Democratic voters were stripped from registration rolls. Hillary Clinton (who won nationwide by 2.9 million votes) has never challenged the mass disenfranchisement or bogus ballot counts that gave Trump the White House.

Here, the challenge to Husted’s de-registration scam was brought by Larry Harmon, a Navy vet from near Akron. He voted in 2004 and 2008, but skipped 2010, 2012 and 2014. In 2015 he came out to vote against marijuana legalization.

But Husted said Harmon didn’t file the postcard confirming his address and intent to vote. Harmon said he never got one. Husted’s argument, said one lawyer, was like telling us that if we don’t talk regularly we will lose our right to free speech.

As investigative journalist Greg Palast noted that Husted’s mailings to voters are designed to look like junk mail and be thrown in the trash. Husted then uses the failure to return the postcard to take away the constitutional voting rights of Ohioans.

The Columbus Dispatch leaped into the fray to support Husted and state the obvious: “Ohio is right to try to keep voter rolls up to date.” This is not what Husted is doing. Yes, voters who have died or have moved out of state should be removed. Perhaps Husted and the Dispatch have never heard of computer hard drives that can hold terabytes of information; maybe they forgot that they require voter IDs at the polls. In this high-tech era with strict voter ID laws, why must names be purged from the rolls?

The New York Times, citing US Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer and evidence submitted in the case, reported that only four percent of people move outside their county of residence in any given year. The vast majority of those who move, do so within their county and would still be eligible to vote a provisional ballot. It should be the duty of election officials to assist voters, not to deprive them of their fundamental right to vote.

Not surprisingly, the The Times cited the eminent sell-out professor Edward Foley of the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, who stated, “Genuine voter suppression is really horrific, but I don’t think Ohio is being terribly irresponsible in what it was doing.”

What’s irresponsible is Foley endorsing unnecessary and clearly undemocratic practices and acting as an apologist for the new Jim Crow.

Unless the Democrats shut the GOP’s court-certified road to another election theft, we could lose a lot more than that.

Appears in Issue: