A reasonably evenhanded biography of Barack Obama, published last year,
describes him as "an exceptionally gifted politician who, throughout his
life, has been able to make people of wildly divergent vantage points see in
him exactly what they want to see." The biographer, David Mendell, reports
that "the higher he soared, the more this politician spoke in well-worn
platitudes and the more he offered warm, feel-good sentiments lacking a
precise framework."
Now, less than four months before Election Day, with growing disquiet among
significant portions of Obama’s progressive base, the current negative
reactions can’t be dismissed as potshots from the political margins. Even
the New York Times, in a July 4 editorial headlined "New and Not Improved,"
has expressed alarm: "We are not shocked when a candidate moves to the
center for the general election. But Mr. Obama’s shifts are striking because
he was the candidate who proposed to change the face of politics, the man of
passionate convictions who did not play old political games."
But on July 8, Obama made a valid point -- even if it wasn’t exactly the