First and foremost, thank you for your persistence, patience and dedication yesterday.

With the exception of a few glitches early on, Election Day was surprisingly tame compared to recent years. Here's a link to some Columbus Dispatch coverage of voting issues.

While the headline and lead are congratulatory, deeper in the article there are many of the same observations and concerns Video the Vote documented as well. Confusion over paper versus provisional ballots and early voting as opposed to absentee demonstrate the need for clearer communication at all levels of the voting process. Poll worker training, independent voter registration and increased media coverage leading up to Election Day did turn out voters in greater numbers, but still not in the quantities anticipated. Further, the high number of provisional ballots, especially in urban areas, suggests opportunities for improvement.

Thanks to all of you within our Free Press community and across the nation whose hard work these past four years has resulted in such a historic day. Take some time to reflect on the achievement and enjoy the partial restoration of democracy in the U.S. and Ohio. There are still some major flaws in our electoral system that need addressed. Our movement will not end here. Just remember, our president-elect Barack Obama will only be successful in achieving our hopes of a peaceful and just world if we the people stay strong and vigilant.

Right now, in Darfur and Chad, the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) is facing huge challenges. Due to a steady increase in violence, the number of refugees is increasing daily. At the same time, UNHCR is facing unbudgeted expenses due to the increase in the prices of fuel and food this year. "When we screen new arriving refugees, we hear many similar stories of burned villages, kidnapping, and murdered family members," says Mari Sveen, a UN Refugee Agency protection officer in Chad. The good news is that you can help twice as much as before. An anonymous donor has promised to match your tax-deductible donation, dollar-for-dollar, up to $1 million!

Matching Gift Challenge. Double your Impact This is such an extraordinary opportunity for you to double your support of the refugees who are suffering every day and who desperately need your help to survive.
Barack Obama is heading to Election Day with a razor thin 6 point lead in the popular polls in Ohio, according to the usually reliable Columbus Dispatch poll. This means that the Buckeye state could again decide who enters the White House in January, despite the fact that nationwide Obama's lead has been registered as high as 11-12 percent.

In a country with truly fair elections, a reliable vote count, and no electoral college, ssuch a lead should be commanding.

But in the America of 2008, it will be enough only if tens of thousands of grassroots election protection activists, rallied primarily through the independent internet, can protect voter registrations, guarantee the ability to vote at the polling stations, and somehow procure an accurate, un-tampered with vote count.

We are seniors at the Social Justice High School in Chicago, and in our math class, we have been working to understand whether or not something went wrong in the 2004 presidential election. We have used statistics, facts, and formulas to demonstrate that some of the election results did not happen by chance. During our analyses, we discovered that the differences between the exit polls (random confidential surveys done immediately after voting) and the recorded votes did not match. Although we expect some differences, due to sample variation, the numbers were mathematically improbable or basically impossible!

A former Montague resident and plaintiff in a federal class-action lawsuit says he's "100 percent certain" that the 2004 presidential election was stolen, and believes the Republican Party is attempting to steal the 2008 election as well.

Harvey Wasserman, who lived in Montague for 14 years and is now editor of the online Freepress.org as well as author of four books on vote-tampering and disenfranchisement in Ohio four years ago, predicts that Democratic candidate Barack Obama will need a 10 percent vote margin to compensate for election manipulation and racism if he's to win the presidency.

"There have been political shenanigans throughout history," said Wasserman, who authored an alternative history of the United States in 1972 and 11 other books, including "How the GOP Stole America's 2004 Election & Is Rigging 2008." But in 2000, 2004, "and here again in 2008," the Republican party has been working "to disenfranchise as many potential Democratic voters as possible."
I’d thought little about Ralph Nader’s potential electoral impact until I read recent polls suggesting he was drawing 3% among likely Ohio voters, 4% in Nevada (plus 1% for Cynthia McKinney), 3% in Pennsylvania, and 5% in Missouri. This means he might once again help tip an election.

Most of Nader’s supporters suggest their votes won’t make the critical difference. Or explain “the lesser of two evils is still evil.” Or list Obama stands they disagree with, some of which I disagree with as well.

But let’s assume that the current election still hangs in the balance: that between Republican voter suppression, last-minute attack ads, latent racism, and the uncertainties of turnout among new registrants, McCain and Palin just might be able to win. If you’re a Nader or McKinney supporter, I’d like to address this article to you, and ask how you’d feel if, by not voting for Obama, you ended up helping electing them.

Pages

Subscribe to ColumbusFreePress.com  RSS