On his way to confirmation as U.S. ambassador to Iraq, the
current U.N. envoy John Negroponte was busily twisting language like a
pretzel at a Senate hearing the other day. The new Baghdad regime, to
be installed on June 30, will have sovereignty. Well, sort of.
Negroponte explained: “That is why I use the term ‘exercise of
sovereignty.’ I think in the case of military activity, their forces
will come under the unified command of the multinational force. That
is the plan.”
In other words, the Baghdad government will be praised as the
embodiment of Iraqi sovereignty while the U.S. military continues to
do whatever Washington wants it to do in Iraq -- including order the
Iraqi military around. Negroponte talked about “real dialogue between
our military commanders, the new Iraqi government and, I think, the
United States mission as well.” But ultimately, he said, the American
military “is going to have the freedom to act in their self-defense,
and they’re going to be free to operate in Iraq as they best see fit.”
The disconnect between democracy rhetoric and imperial reality is