Was George bush "miked-up" during his second debate with John Kerry like he was during the first debate? In the first debate it became very obvious when, roughly half way through the debate in the middle of talking about how a commander in chief acts, Bush told someone to "let me finish"?. There was no one in the room talking to Bush and the only place Bush could have heard a voice was from a microphone in his ear or on his person. Also, can anybody really believe Bush could have remembered all those facts and figures he came up with? How can Bush call himself a leader when he can't even debate John Kerry without help?

Seems like every group and its hamster has put out some kind of dossier on the last four years. Top Bush Lies. One Hundred Mistakes Bush could admit to. Best scandals. Biggest Bush flip-flops. Iraq. The economy. The environment.

            Corporate pork and payoffs galore. Homeland insecurity. The deficit. On and on it goes.

            But I like to remember the little things, those itty-bitty things that really made it special. Those touches of style. The je ne sais quoi of it all. Like choosing Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday to announce his administration would oppose affirmative action in the University of Michigan case, calling it "divisive," "unfair" and "unconstitutional." Classy timing. Of course, Bush (Andover, Yale, Delta Kappa Epsilon, Harvard Business, three failed oil companies rescued by Daddy's friends, set up by Daddy's friends in baseball and given a huge cut for a tiny investment) never experienced affirmative action in his life. Made it all on his own, pulled himself up by his bootstraps -- black people can do it, too.

AUSTIN, Texas -- Now is the time for all good men -- and women -- to race to the aid of their country. Liberals and libertarians unite! The Sinclair Broadcasting Group has moved this election into the realm of creeping fascism, state propaganda, Big Brother and brainwashing. What me, hyperbole?

            This is SO simple -- how would you conservatives feel if NBC, CBS or ABC decided to pre-empt primetime programming a week before the election to air Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11"? And then announced, "But we've offered President Bush a chance to reply"?

            Sinclair has also offered President George W. Bush the inestimable service of diverting attention from his record and is using OUR publicly owned airwaves to do it.

            For Sinclair's lobbyist and on-air editorialist Mark Hyman to claim this long attack ad is "news" is ludicrous -- almost as strained as his claim, somewhere between infelicitous and crackers, that those who disagree are like "Holocaust deniers."

Forty years ago this month, a young man named Mario Savio, 21 years old, climbed on top of a car in Berkeley, Calif., and let fly with a stream of incendiary rhetoric, and the Berkeley Free Speech Movement was born.

            I'll skip the next chapters and go straight to "forty years later," meaning Oct. 7, 2004, when a fellow two years older than Savio would have been if he hadn't keeled over a few years ago, clambered onto a chair at the corner of Telegraph and Bancroft, right outside the entry to the University of California at Berkeley and let fly with a stream of rhetoric that would have been a lot more incendiary for the crowds in Sproul Plaza if Lenni Brenner had remembered to bring a bullhorn.

            These days, the Free Speech Movement is comfortably, maybe too comfortably, installed on the Berkeley calendar as an annual event where FSM veterans look back on the Sixties (initial phase), hold panels on such topics as -- I'm quoting from the Fortieth Anniversary program, which stretched across four days -- on "the FSM: Its Genesis, Meanings and Consequences" and seek to hector youth for their lack of revolutionary zeal.

In an election likely to be decided as much by voter turnout as by convincing the remaining undecided, how do we maintain the hope that’s necessary to keep making the phone calls, knocking on the doors, funding the key ads, and doing all the other critical tasks to get Bush out of office?

Even those of us working hard for change hit walls of doubt and uncertainty about whether our actions really matter. Our spirits rise and fall as if on a roller coaster with each shift in the polls. In a time when lies too often seem to prevail, we wonder whether it’s worthwhile to keep making the effort.

We need to remind ourselves that we never can predict all the results of our actions. A few years ago, I met a Wesleyan University student who, with a few friends, registered nearly three hundred fellow students concerned about environmental threats and cuts in government financial aid programs. The Congressman they supported won by twenty-one votes. Before they began, the student and her friends feared that their modest efforts would be irrelevant.

This week, Sinclair Broadcasting, the largest owner of local television stations in the U.S., ordered its 62 stations to preempt regular programming to air an anti-Kerry documentary just a few days before the election.

Sinclair's mission is clear: sway the election in favor of an administration that lets companies like Sinclair get even bigger. It's great for Sinclair's bottom line — terrible for our democracy.

This is not about 'liberal' or 'conservative.' It's about corruption, the threat to democratic discourse, and the manipulation of elections. Together, we can stop them.

Stop Sinclair: http://freepress.net/sinclair/
AUSTIN, Texas -- President Bush may not be dumb, but he sure does think the rest of us are.

You have to assume your audience is a bunch of borderline morons to tell as many whoppers as he does. True, short-term memory loss is creeping up on a lot of us, but even I can remember what Bush told us about why we had to invade Iraq.

There was about a rationale a week, but the main contenders were because: (A) Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and (B) links to Al Qaeda, so the WMD might get into terrorist hands. The supposed Saddam Hussein-Al Qaeda connection was so often trumpeted that by the time the war started, 70 percent of Americans believed Saddam Hussein was behind 9-11.

I grew up watching the antics of the famous ventriloquist Edgar Bergen and his wooden companion, Charlie McCarthy. The world has now been treated to a performance by their successors, Edgar Rove and Charlie McBush.

There is substantial and growing evidence that President Bush was “wired”, and receiving transmitted answers to questions he was asked during his first debate with Senator John Kerry. And CNN picked up the transmission of words to President Bush immediately before he spoke those very words at a D-Day event in France this year. It is unclear why the mainstream press did not pursue the matter at that time.

Dear Free Press,

In the article,  Kerry's Four Magic Words Tonight To Win It All: "George Bush Must Resign" by Harvey Wasserman , the article states "It (the Bush administration)  lied to the American people. It lied to Congress. It lied to the global community.  

Okay, the article is telling me they lied but why did they lie?   What is the truth they are covering up with those lies? 

Thank you.
Once again, the hatred and lies of free press reaches hilarious proportions. Kerry got absolutely punked on Friday. However, he did do one thing right: He didn't take your advice to demand Bush's resignation. He would have been laughed off the stage. The bong-gurgling anarchists would have cheered, but so what? Besides, Kerry is on the record as saying he believed Saddam had WMD's. Ah, when Bush gets re-elected, we will all be giving the Bush-haters in America the bird. And if Airhead America's Randi Rhodes is unhappy with Bush's re-election, she can go whizz on a Christmas tree like she did 5 years ago.

Pages

Subscribe to ColumbusFreePress.com  RSS