Like many progressives, I've felt torn between Howard Dean's and Dennis
Kucinich's respective strengths. I've resolved this conflict so far by
embracing my indecision and giving money to both. Kucinich has spoken out,
eloquently and thoughtfully, taking stands that challenge the conventional
wisdom of our time, and point toward powerful long-term alternatives. Dean's
stands are more cautious, but he's revived the Democratic Party by being
willing to challenge Bush on a host of key issues, and brought more ordinary
citizens into electoral politics than any Democratic politician in years.
When Dean says, "America is not Rome," it contrasts starkly with an
administration that's tried its best to make us the world's imperial
policeman.
A year ago, a surging global peace movement offered hope, but I saw little
to cheer me on the U.S. electoral front. The most prominent Democratic
candidates--Kerry, Gephardt, and Lieberman--had just finished helping give
Bush his victory on the war vote. In Gephardt's case, he helped write the
resolution, line up the House votes, and take the political postures