Advertisement

The time has come when silence is betrayal of the legacy of Martin Luther King, Jr. Rev. King was assassinated on April 4, 1968 – exactly one year after, to the day, he delivered his most profound indictment of U.S. militarism. His “Silence is Betrayal” speech, given at Riverside Church in New York City on April 4, 1967, denounced “a nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift.”

As half a million dollar missiles fall on the Iraqi people, as the citizens of the United States face a $400 billion deficit, the highest in history, and the yearly defense budget of the U.S. approaches $500 billion approximately half of the military spending on Earth, King’s words remain relevant today.

King, despite his inner search for truth, did not come easily to opposing the politics of the Johnson administration as the Vietnam War raged. King’s great spirit, that seemed to instinctively speak truth to power, feared “the apathy of conformity” in “his own bosom.” King courageously overcame being “mesmerized by uncertainty” and instead, spoke out forcefully.

Now more than ever, we need to implement the solutions and technology that exist today to start saving oil. Making our cars and trucks go farther on a gallon of gas is the biggest single step we can take to cut our crippling dependence on oil and curb global warming. Ford and other automakers have the technology to make new cars, SUVs and pickup trucks average 40 miles per gallon - 66% further on a gallon of gas.

Please take a moment to call and ask Ford Motor Company to do its part to cut America's reliance on oil by boosting the fuel economy of new cars, SUVs and pickup trucks to 40 miles per gallon.

You can call Ford using their toll-free customer service number at 1-800-392-3673, then press 3 and at the next prompt press either 1 or 2. When a customer service representative comes on the phone, tell them that Ford needs to use existing technology to make cars and trucks go further on a gallon of gas. Here's a sample message you can leave:

"Hi, my name is _____ and I'm calling to urge Ford Motor Company to raise the average fuel economy of its vehicles to 40 miles per gallon. Using existing
We went to the theater tonight and saw, “How to lose a guy in ten days.“ It was not the best movie I have ever seen. You might enjoy it more than I especially if you like “chick flicks”. I am predisposed by gender to be a hard sell. When I see an unending array of ulterior transactions, what Eric Berne would call game like behavior, I start to wince. When I started seeing it as an analogy to the current political dilemma that we are facing, I started enjoying it a lot more.

A very tragic aspect of the war against Iraq is that the administration has convinced so many good people to help him do this terrible thing by telling them that it is necessary and good for America, good for Iraq, and good for the world. More and more people are asking themselves if the purpose of this war is to protect our freedoms or to support Bush’s re-election.

Look at what we have lost even if the military succeeds in all the objectives they have set for themselves. The cost in billions of dollars that could have been used to improve education, rebuild highways provide health care and job training can never be recouped. The damage done to
Last October, the New York Times reported that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld ordered the military’s regional commanders to rewrite all of their war plans to capitalize on precision weapons, better intelligence and speedier deployment in the event the United States decided to invade Iraq. That war plan, which Rumsfeld helped shape, has now failed and has led to deep divisions between military commanders and the defense secretary, according to news reports.   

Despite Rumsfeld’s recent denials that he did not override requests by military brass to deploy more ground troops in Iraq, he told the Times last year that the cornerstone of the war plan against Iraq was to use fewer ground troops, a move that caused consternation among some in the military who said concern for the troops requires overwhelming numerical superiority to assure victory, the Times reported in its Oct. 13, 2002 edition.   

These officers said they view Rumsfeld's approach as injecting too much risk into war planning and have said it could result in U.S. casualties that might be prevented by amassing larger forces.   

The Peter Arnett fiasco seems to this observer to reflect poorly on NBC News, which apparently sees the role of a news network as that of printing the "official" story and to hell with the truth.  

I admit that I would feel better had Arnett landed with some paper other than the tabloid London Mirror.  It will be interesting to follow this story.  

I see that Geraldo Rivera denies having been told to leave Iraq.  Unfortunately, he lost any sign of credibility long years ago.  

Peter Arnett will stay in my memory for the magnificent job he performed in Vietnam all those decades ago.  

Bob Powers
Writer-Editor
The Issue:
On May 9, 2001, President George W. Bush has nominated Jeffrey S. Sutton, of Ohio, to serve on the Sixth circuit court of Appeals, which hears cases from Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee.

The ISSUE:
Legislation has been introduced in the US House of Representatives, H.R. 1036, and in the U.S. Senate, S. 659, to give immunity from lawsuits to gun manufacturers and gun dealers.

Specifically, the legislation would block suits filed by governments, civic groups and individual victims of gun violence seeking to hold the gun industry accountable for irresponsible manufacturing or selling of guns. If a parent loses a child because a gun was not manufactured with a simple and inexpensive child safety device, the parent would have no recourse to make sure the same tragedy didn't happen to another family. Sweeping federal immunity would also stop lawsuits filed by victims seeking to hold gun manufacturers and sellers accountable for their role in recklessly marketing and supplying guns to criminals.

The ISSUE:
Despite the fact that equal opportunity programs, such as affirmative action, have proven to be an effective tool that gives qualified individuals equal access to participate and contribute; access that has been historically denied, they have come under attack again in recent years. Most recently, the US Supreme Court agreed to hear in April a case attacking the equal opportunity admissions program at the University of Michigan law school. Unfortunately, President Bush has announced that he intends to file a brief in support of the plaintiff’s case and against the University’s affirmative action program.

The fact of the matter is that our nation still needs equal opportunity programs in education, employment and contracting. Approximately 18% of all college students are African American, Latino, or American Indian compared with 28% of the college age population. African American men and women comprise less than 2.5% of total employment in the top jobs in the private sector. Based on their number, minority-owned firms received only 57 cents for every federal dollar they would be expected to receive if they were not a minority-owned firm.
George W. Bush has attacked Iraq and put the world into a horrific vice that is the global peace movement's ultimate challenge: stopping a holy war that can only escalate into irrational and unstoppable mass slaughter.

In traditional geopolitical terms, the downward spiral of this catastrophic American attack has been fairly straightforward: Among other things:

· For weeks the entire world was riveted on Bush's campaign to win nine of fifteen votes on the Security Council to endorse the attack on Iraq. When he failed, he treated the UN as if it were no longer relevant, potentially weakening it for decades to come;

· UN weapons inspectors, led by Hans Blix, reported good progress in disarming Iraq right up to the moment the US attacked. They reacted angrily when their work was cut short. By attacking Iraq after it at least partially disarmed, the US may have doomed future UN disarmament efforts;

James Coleman, Chair of the American Bar Association’s (ABA) Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities, testified before Congress on June 20 urging reform: “When the criminal justice system wrongfully sends an innocent person to prison or death row, it threatens all of us. The unimaginable horror of the execution of an innocent person should give us all the resolve to do what is necessary to fix what now clearly is a broken system.”

Pages

Subscribe to ColumbusFreePress.com  RSS