Advertisement

Since the bottom line here is terrible physical pain, let's start with someone who has spent most of her life in that condition. There are millions like her. Patricia C. is 47 today and lives in California. At the age of 12 she developed scoliosis, and 16 years later, her doctors told her she had the neck and spine of an 80-year-old. A car crash in 1998 left her with additional spinal trauma and a brain injury. Her whole life revolved around pain. She had no appetite, was sunk in depression and prayed to God to release her from her torment.

It's not as though medical marijuana shifted Patricia to a bed of roses. "A lot of the time," Patricia C. said recently, "I have to take far more medicine for my body -- for the pain, the nausea and muscle spasms -- than my brain can handle. I wake up every night in pain. I get up every morning in pain." But, as she says, "Today, I am in relatively good spirits, primarily because of my daily use of medical marijuana, which I find an absolute godsend. I can use it daily. It isn't addictive, and it isn't detrimental to my health."

Who has not clambered onto a bus, headed off to a protest demonstration and stood amid sparse company in the rain, thinking, "What's the use?" Who has not listened to some plucky orator rasping through a bullhorn, "Let our message go forth ... " and thought privately, "Forth to whom? Who's listening? Who cares?"

These days, there's a spirited movement growing across the United States opposing a war against Iraq. There have been some big events, like the rallies in Washington, D.C., and San Francisco, attended by vast throngs. But there have also been rallies and vigils by the score in small towns.

Are they making a difference?

Of course they are, just like the demonstrations in Europe, the Middle East, Australia and elsewhere. U.S. ambassadors and CIA heads of station may deprecate and downplay the world protests in their reports, but they cannot dismiss them, any more than can the White House. How can you ignore a turnout of 500,000 in Florence?

AUSTIN, Texas -- Whee, here we go, the Ledge is back in session! And many a village is missing its idiot. The 78th biennial disaster is upon us, and what glorious fodder to feast upon.

Our peerless leaders are faced with a $9.9 billion deficit, almost twice as high as previously estimated, and billions in mandatory increased spending, so the new Republican majority is busily planning to solve this crisis by: (A) outlawing same-sex marriage, (B) giving more legal protection to fetuses and (C) knocking gay Texans out from under coverage by the Hate Crimes Act. This is tremendously useful of them.

Gov. Goodhair Perry has already earned himself a new nickname after a stunning interview with the Austin American-Statesman in which he noted that Texas has two very serious problems that he, Rick the Reluctant, plans to do exactly nothing about. "Gov. Rick Perry said Wednesday that Texas is burdened by an outdated, out-of-whack tax system and a public education finance system that has to go," reported the paper. "But the state's top elected leader also said Texans shouldn't expect the upcoming
Now that several weeks have passed since Mississippi Senator Trent Lott's forced resignation as Senate majority leader, we might begin to acquire deeper insights into the real nature of this recent controversy.

  The initial comments that got Lott into trouble, his praise for the 1948 white supremacist presidential campaign of South Carolina Senator Strom Thurmond, were no gaffe or "terrible" misstatement.  Throughout his sorry public career, Lott had expressed similarly backward beliefs, and even worse.  Back in 1980, for example, at a campaign rally in Mississippi for then-presidential candidate Ronald Reagan, Lott boldly declared that if Thurmond had been elected president on the 1948 Dixiecrat ticket "we wouldn't be in the mess we are today."

 
For several months now, political analysts from both major parties and the media have pushed the argument that President Bush and the Republicans achieved an unprecedented victory in this November's Congressional elections.  Only hours after the polls closed, for example, Bush's press secretary Ari Fleischer announced, "It is a big victory."  Tony Coelho, Al Gore's 2000 campaign chairman, agreed.  "The White took a huge gamble; they rolled the dice, and it worked," Coelho said with apparent admiration.  Bush "got his mandate, he got his victory and now he can govern for two years."  

Republicans attributed their victories to President Bush's "personal popularity."  Of the twenty-three Congressional districts Bush visited to support Republican candidates, 21 of them won.  Out of 16 Senate candidates Bush campaigned with, twelve won.  

PRESIDENT BUSH:  GOOD MORNING, GENTLEMEN.

VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY:  GOOD MORNING, GEORGE.

SECRETARY OF STATE POWELL:  REPORTING FOR DUTY, SIR.

ATTORNEY-GENERAL ASHCROFT:  GOOD MORNING.

PRESIDENT BUSH:  Well, boys, I've gotta tell you I'm pretty steamed this morning.  Why haven't we found those weapons of mass destruction yet?  Colin?

SECRETARY OF STATE POWELL:  They're not in Iraq, Sir.  They're in Korea. 

VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY:  George, we've been through this before.  We all knew there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.  Saddam isn't stupid. 

PRESIDENT BUSH:  I don't need to hear about whether Saddam Hussein is stupid or he isn't stupid, Dick.  I'm not stupid, that's all that counts.  We set to attack Iraq long before I ran for president.  And where the hell is the evidence we need to sell this damn thing. 

SECRETARY POWELL:  Seems like we've been outfoxed.

KARL ROVE:  Sorry I'm late, gentlemen.  I just got the latest wire from North Korea.  They've told us to take a hike.

PRESIDENT BUSH:  GOOD MORNING, GENTLEMEN.

VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY:  GOOD MORNING, GEORGE.

SECRETARY OF STATE POWELL:  REPORTING FOR DUTY, SIR.

ATTORNEY-GENERAL ASHCROFT:  GOOD MORNING.

PRESIDENT BUSH:  Well, boys, I've gotta tell you I'm pretty steamed this morning.  Why haven't we found those weapons of mass destruction yet?  Colin?

SECRETARY OF STATE POWELL:  They're not in Iraq, Sir.  They're in Korea. 

VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY:  George, we've been through this before.  We all knew there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.  Saddam isn't stupid. 

PRESIDENT BUSH:  I don't need to hear about whether Saddam Hussein is stupid or he isn't stupid, Dick.  I'm not stupid, that's all that counts.  We set to attack Iraq long before I ran for president.  And where the hell is the evidence we need to sell this damn thing. 

SECRETARY POWELL:  Seems like we've been outfoxed.

KARL ROVE:  Sorry I'm late, gentlemen.  I just got the latest wire from North Korea.  They've told us to take a hike.

AUSTIN, Texas -- I just love the fine print in the president's tax-cut plan. I grant you, the overall effect is pretty spectacular, too -- a plan that has almost no stimulative effect but still opens a future of zillion-dollar deficits to drag down the economy. That's the backasswards of what we need, but it's not the fun part.

Look at these little goodies:

New York, Jan 1 (GIN) -- Under pressure from aid agencies and mounting bad publicity, Swiss-based multinational Nestle has dropped its demand for $6 million from the famine-stricken Ethiopian government.

   Nestle claimed the $6 million was owed by Ethiopia since the former regime lead by Haile Mengistu nationalized a livestock company owned by a Nestle subsidiary.

   Ethiopia, in the middle of a ravaging famine that threatens millions of lives, had offered $1.5 million to cover the debt based on the assessed value of the company in 1975, the time of the nationalization. But Nestle rejected that amount, pushing for the value at the current rate of exchange between the dollar and the Ethiopian birr.

   The World Bank, which had been negotiating on behalf of the Ethiopian government, reportedly expressed surprise at the hard line taken by the multinational which owns Nestle. "This $1m in our opinion is justifiable. But this is not the point of view of Nestle. They are trying to get as much as they can," said a World Bank spokesman in a published report.

   Nestle had just about wriggled free from years of bad
New York, Dec. 30 (GIN) -- The Togolese parliament yesterday changed the constitution in a way that will allow President Gnassingbe Eyadema to seek re-election in next year's June elections.

   As it stood, the 1992 constition required Eyadema to step down after two five-year terms. But now, he will be able to run for re-election as many times as he wishes to.

   Opposition groups have called the amendations a constitional coup.

   Jean-Pierre Fabre of the opposition party, Union of Forces for Change said, "We call on the Togolese people to mobilize immediately to oppose this 'coup de force' of President Eyadema."

   Eyadema, who came to power in a 1967 military coup, is Africa's longest serving head of state. He kept Togo in a single- party system until 1993, when he won the country's first mult- party presidential election. Opposition parties boycotted the poll.

   In 1998, Eyadema won the second multparty presidential election, in which he was accused of vote-rigging and other electoral malpractice.

   Eyadema's Rally of Togolese People (RPT) party has 72 of the

Pages

Subscribe to ColumbusFreePress.com  RSS